California Court of Appeal Affirms Legality of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Rejects Municipal Bans
City of Los Angeles will soon vote on whether to enact an outright ban similar to the County ban just rejectedLos Angeles, CA -- The Second District Court of
Appeal in California issued a landmark decision yesterday in County
of Los Angeles v. Alternative Medicinal Cannabis Collective
(AMCC), which affirmed the legality of medical marijuana
dispensaries under state law, and rejected bans imposed by
municipalities. In particular, the AMCC court held that Los
Angeles County's "complete ban" on medical marijuana is "preempted"
by state law and, therefore, void. The AMCC decision
reverses a preliminary injunction granted to the County by the Los
Angeles Superior Court in May 2011.
On the issue of whether dispensaries are legal under state law, the
AMCC court ruled that, "[T]he repeated use of the term
'dispensary' throughout [Health and Safety Code section 11362.768]
and the reference in subdivision (e) to a 'storefront or mobile
retail outlet' make it abundantly clear that the medical marijuana
collectives authorized by section 11362.775 are permitted by state
law to perform a dispensary function." The AMCC further held
that, "[Los Angeles] County's total, per se nuisance ban against
medical marijuana dispensaries directly contradicts the
Legislature's intent," and called that contradiction "direct,
patent, obvious, and palpable."
This landmark decision comes as a number of other state appellate
court rulings impacting dispensaries have been granted review by the
California Supreme Court, including Pack v. City of Long Beach,
which addresses how localities can regulate distribution, and City
of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patient's Health and Wellness,
which deals with whether municipalities can permanently ban
distribution. The California Supreme Court could also decide to
review the AMCC ruling, which it will decide in the next
several weeks.
"The court of appeal could not have been clearer in expressing that
medical marijuana dispensaries are legal under state law, and that
municipalities have no right to ban them," said Joe Elford, Chief
Counsel with Americans for Safe Access, the country's leading
medical marijuana advocacy group. "This landmark decision should
have a considerable impact on how the California Supreme Court rules
in the various dispensary cases it's currently reviewing."
On July 24th, the City of Los Angeles is scheduled to vote on a
dispensary ban similar to the one enacted by the County, but just
rejected by the court of appeal. "The AMCC decision puts a
giant wrench into the plans of City Attorney Trutanich to persuade
the City Council to enact a ban," continued Elford. The proposal
introduced by Council member Huizar to ban dispensaries, which
appeared to be favored by many of his colleagues, now faces an
uncertain fate. Patient advocates have been pushing for a more
sensible alternative being proposed by Council members Koretz and
Wesson that would create “limited immunity” for a certain number of
dispensaries in the city.
Further information:
Landmark ruling in County of Los Angeles v. Alternative
Medicinal Cannabis Collective:
http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/AMCC_Appellate_Court_Decision.pdf
Lower court ruling in County of Los Angeles v. Alternative
Medicinal Cannabis Collective:
http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/AMCC_Superior_Court_Decision.pdf