Milestone medical marijuana case goes to court
,
A rare opportunity for
medical marijuana patients is coming on Oct. 16 at 9:30 a.m. in the
United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Science
will be pitted against politically motivated decisions for the first
time. It's a match-up the feds have avoided for years. Ten
years after the Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis (CRC) filed its
petition, the courts will finally review the scientific evidence
regarding the therapeutic value of marijuana. The D.C. Circuit Court agreed to hear oral arguments in Americans for Safe Access v. Drug Enforcement Administration. ”Medical
marijuana patients are finally getting their day in court,” said Joe
Elford, Chief Counsel with Americans for Safe Access, the country's
leading medical marijuana advocacy group. ”What's at stake in
this case is nothing less than our country's scientific integrity and
the imminent needs of millions of patients,” Elford said in a press
release. This is a case that could have major implications for
taking marijuana out of Schedule I, a category that also includes heroin
and LSD. Schedule I drugs are described as substances that
“have a high potential for abuse, have no current accepted medical use
in the United States, and there is a lack of accepted safety for the use
of the drug or other substance under medical supervision.” Perhaps it was no coincidence that the announcement of oral arguments comes weeks after a study by
Dr. Igor Grant was published in The Open Neurology Journal. He is one
of the leading U.S. medical marijuana researchers, and claims
marijuana's Schedule I classification is “not tenable.”
For years
now, advocates for medical marijuana have submitted reports and studies
showing the medicinal effects of marijuana but have been unable to crack
the feds' wall of blind resistance to them. Dr. Grant and his
associates have concluded it's not true that marijuana has no medical
value, nor that information on safety is lacking. The study urged
additional research, and stated that marijuana's federal classification
and its political controversy are “obstacles to medical progress in this
area.” The Obama Justice Department has been escalating its
attacks in medical marijuana states, with dozens of new federal
indictments and prosecutions. Though U.S. Attorneys often claim the
accused have violated state law in some way, defendants are prevented
from using any medical evidence or a state law defense in federal court.
Hopefully we'll see sanity and logic prevail, and marijuana
will be reclassified, allowing federal defendants to use a medical
necessity defense in future cases. Seventeen states and the
District of Columbia have adopted medical marijuana laws that not only
recognize the medical efficacy of marijuana, but also provide safe and
legal access to it. The DEA's aggressive campaign against
marijuana has escalated under the Obama administration and it's more
important now than ever for patients to get their rights back. The trend
has to be stopped. How unreasonable have the feds been? During
congressional testimony earlier this year, DEA Administrator Michele
Leonhart refused to say whether crack or heroin posed bigger health
risks than marijuana. Really? I don't know how Leonhart can
look in the mirror after displaying that kind of stubborn ignorance.
From day one, making marijuana illegal was a political ploy, based upon
racism and ignorance. Now there's a chance to reverse decades
of a failed policy that should never have developed. Imagine how much
more can be discovered about the medical properties of marijuana when
legitimate research is funded instead of the bogus fed-funded farces
that have been the rule thus far? Millions of people will
benefit. Millions of dollars can be diverted from the Lost War on Drugs
if marijuana is rescheduled. The door will be open to legalization,
something that 50 percent of Americans want, according to national
polls. As It Stands, this is a milestone case because it's the
first time the real merits of marijuana will be considered by a federal
court that could change its legal status.